Cases 71 - 80 of 860
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
El v. Booth, et al
as 5:2023cv00063
Respondent:
Agent, Ken S. Booth, John Allen Campbell and others
Petitioner:
Sean Alim El
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
John Allen v. Kia America, Inc.
as 8:2023cv00768
Plaintiff:
John Allen
Defendant:
Kia America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
John Fredrich Longo et al v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv01744
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
John Fredrich Longo, Gregory Kevin Martin, Leon W Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03142
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Allen v. Kia America, Inc.
as 1:2023cv01009
Plaintiff:
John Allen
Defendant:
Kia America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
