Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Shahrzad Ardalan v. Fitology et al
as 2:2015cv01880
Plaintiff:
Shahrzad Ardalan
Defendant:
Andrea Benson, John Benson, Fitology and others
Dann Long et al v. Veterans Administration et al
as 5:2015cv00337
Defendant:
Fred Agudelo, American Septic Services, Inc., Christney Barilla and others
Plaintiff:
James Alderton, Dann Long, Marla McPeters and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. DGSE Companies Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01909
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
I John Benson and DGSE Companies Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Benson et al v. Detroit Public Schools et al
as 2:2013cv14930
Defendant:
Detroit Public Schools , Michael Barclay , Securitas Security Services USA, INC and others
Plaintiff:
John Benson , Sophia Benson and T. B.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cabreja v. County of Nassau et al
as 2:2013cv01019
Defendant:
Correction Officer John Benson, Correction Officer John Boniface, Correction Officer John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
John Cabreja, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Farmer v. DGSE Companies, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv03850
Plaintiff:
Jason Farmer
Defendant:
DGSE Companies, Inc., William H Oyster, James D Clem and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Barfuss v. DGSE Companies, Inc et al
as 3:2012cv03664
Plaintiff:
Grant Barfuss
Defendant:
DGSE Companies, Inc, L.S. Smith, John Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
John Benson v. City of San Jose, et al
as 12-15834
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN BENSON, an individual
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SAN JOSE, a public entity and BRIAN PETTIS, Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
USA v. John Benson
as 11-51267
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOHN BENSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
