Cases 1 - 10 of 50
THOMAS v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
QUARTEZ THOMAS
Defendant:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN, Commander MITCHELL, Lieutenant Colonel JOHN DARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
THOMAS v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE et al
as 4:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
QUARTEZ THOMAS
Defendant:
MUSCOGEE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN, Sergeant CHARLES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SISTRUNK v. COUNTRYMAN et al
as 4:2021cv00069
Defendant:
Sheriff GREG COUNTRYMAN, Captain BOB TROMBLEY, commander LARRY MITCHELL and others
Plaintiff:
TREVIS TYRELL SISTRUNK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROBERTS v. THOMPKINS, et al.
as 4:2019cv00121
Defendant:
JOHN DARR, DONNA THOMPKINS and DONNA TOMPKINS
Plaintiff:
JOHNATHAN L ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PALMER v. DARR et al
as 4:2017cv00102
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE COMPANIES INC., DANE COLLINS, JOHN DARR and others
Plaintiff:
QUINTIN PALMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Idahosa v. City of Columbus, Georgia, et al
as 17-12169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT IDAHOSA
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF COLUMBUS, GEORGIA, COLUMBUS GEORGIA POLICE DEPARTMENT, RICHARD BOREN, Police Chief and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Christopher Russell v. John Darr, et al
as 17-11660
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER RUSSELL
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DARR, ANTHONY ERMI, Deputy, JUAN A. MERRITT, Deputy and others
James Brock v. John Darr
as 17-11384
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES L. BROCK
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN DARR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00038
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
