Cases 41 - 50 of 1,615
COHEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2023cv03658
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY COHEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EDDIE ANDERSON, EMERY MCCOY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLAYLOCK v. STARKE et al
as 1:2023cv03606
Plaintiff:
DAN M BLAYLOCK
Defendant:
PETRA SMELTZER STARKE, JOHN DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03577
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HEWA KODIPPILIGE v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv03573
Plaintiff:
ACHINI HEWA KODIPPILIGE
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, DOUG SONNEK and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
KHAN v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv03460
Plaintiff:
WARIS KHAN
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, ANDREW SCHOFER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
LIU v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2023cv03390
Plaintiff:
YILIN LIU
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, ARNOLD CHACON and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03383
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03250
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
GAMBILL v. JACOBS et al
as 1:2023cv03283
Plaintiff:
BRUCE E. GAMBILL, JR.
Defendant:
ANDREW JACOBS, STATE OF WASHINGTON, PIERCE COUNTY WA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
