Cases 41 - 50 of 294
Slaikeu v. Anderson et al
as 3:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Slaikeu
Defendant:
Glen Anderson, Robert Saxon, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv05021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joshua Pardue v. Jackie Lacey et al
as 2:2022cv05861
Plaintiff:
Joshua Pardue
Defendant:
Jackie Lacy, Craig Kleffman, Phillip Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victory v. Allison et al
as 1:2022at00674
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Victory
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Patrick Eaton, Clark Kelso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Agular et al
as 3:2022cv00979
Plaintiff:
William H. Thomas
Defendant:
Agular, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Farley v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00815
Plaintiff:
Donovan Farley
Defendant:
City of Portland, John Does 2 through 5 and Cameron Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Willie Farfan v. Shannon Dicus et al
as 5:2022cv00845
Plaintiff:
Willie Farfan
Defendant:
Shannon Dicus, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v Garrison et al
as 3:2022cv05451
Plaintiff:
Robert Jesse Hill
Defendant:
Isaiah Garrison, Angela Stranger, Mac Perey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00557
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Abanoob Mounir Malak v. San Bernardino County Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Abanoob Mounir Malak
Defendant:
San Bernardino County Sheriff Department, West Valley Detention Center, Cathy Alis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
