Cases 21 - 30 of 42
Dorsey v. McCain et al
as 1:2017cv01647
Plaintiff:
Michael Dorsey
Defendant:
Sandy McCain, Casey McVea, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United National Insurance Co v. Storer Equipment Co et al
as 5:2017cv01204
Plaintiff:
United National Insurance Co
Defendant:
Advance Catastrophic Technologies, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doe #1 et al v. Conrad Industries Inc
as 6:2017cv01050
Defendant:
Conrad Industries Inc
Plaintiff:
John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gray v. Carvajal et al
as 1:2016cv01275
Plaintiff:
Willie C Gray
Defendant:
M D Carvajal, Jessica Johnson, Medical Administrators and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Louisiana Division Sons of Confederate Veterans v. Natchitoches et al
as 5:2016cv01142
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Division Sons of Confederate Veterans
Defendant:
City of Natchitoches, Lee Posey, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Louisiana Division Sons of Confederate Veterans v. Natchitoches et al
as 1:2016cv01142
Plaintiff:
Louisiana Division Sons of Confederate Veterans
Defendant:
City of Natchitoches , Lee Posey , John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLaughlin v. Lofton et al
as 5:2016cv00352
Plaintiff:
Roy McLaughlin, Jr
Defendant:
Judy Lofton, Darell Hamiter, Lonnie Nail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rossman v. Dimond et al
as 1:2015cv02844
Plaintiff:
Brud Rossman
Defendant:
James Dimond, John Doe #3, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Thompson v. Ackal et al
as 6:2015cv02288
Plaintiff:
Yulanda Thompson
Defendant:
Louis Ackal, Richard Hazlewood, Paul Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pitre v. City of Eunice, et al
as 6:2014cv02843
Plaintiff:
Jana K Pitre
Defendant:
City of Eunice, Rusty Moody, Police Dept City of Eunice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
