Cases 21 - 30 of 70
Josephs v. Portland Police Bureau et al
as 3:2020cv01888
Defendant:
John Doe #1, City of Portland, John Doe #3 and others
Plaintiff:
Cale Josephs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark Jr. v. City of St. Helens et al
as 3:2020cv01723
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1, John Doe 1, Jose H. Castijella III and others
Plaintiff:
Aubrey Clark Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Hammon et al
as 2:2020cv00323
Defendant:
M. Gower, John Doe #2, 3, 4, 5, R. Persson and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bulson-Bratton v. Multnomah County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2020cv00282
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Torrie Carlos Bulson-Bratton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClung v. Shivas Hotel, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01220
Defendant:
Shivas Hotel, Inc., John Doe #1, Shiva Hotels, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kim Christine McClung
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newman v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2019cv01081
Defendant:
Mr. Geeir, Colette S. Peters, Dr. Peng and others
Plaintiff:
Rico Carlos Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
as 3:2019cv00418
Defendant:
John Doe, 2, Federal Bureau of Investigation, John Doe, 3 and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Gray v. Peters et al
as 2:2019cv00175
Defendant:
Judy Gilmore, Jason Bell, John Doe 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Billy J. Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00137
Defendant:
John Doe, 2, John Doe, 3, Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Mendoza v. Peters et al
as 2:2019cv00126
Defendant:
"John" Turner, "John" King, Michael Gower and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Geronimo Mendoza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
