Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV et al v. GREENWOOD DISCOUNT TOBACCO et al
as 1:2018cv03919
Plaintiff:
SREAM, INC. and ROOR INTERNATIONAL BV
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, ONE, GREENWOOD DISCOUNT TOBACCO and JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
MAYFIELD v. BROWN
as 2:2018cv00360
Plaintiff:
CAMERON MAYFIELD
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, ONE, JOHN DOE, TWO and RICHARD BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEAFUS v. COX et al
as 1:2018cv02144
Defendant:
JOHNSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, SHERIFF DOUG COX, DEPUTY SHERIFF RICHARD ROE I and others
Plaintiff:
STEVEN NEAFUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BERTRAM v. LAYTON et al
as 1:2018cv01401
Plaintiff:
DEVON BERTRAM
Defendant:
JOHN DOES ONE THROUGH TWENTY and JOHN R. LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIGSBY et al v. DOE et al
as 1:2014cv01956
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, ONE and STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CANDICE GRIGSBY and ANN GRIGSBY-BALLARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DENNIS v. HANCOCK COUNTY SHERIFF et al
as 1:2014cv00502
Plaintiff:
BELINDA DENNIS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE FIVE, JOHN DOE FOUR, JOHN DOE ONE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JAMES DEAN, INC. et al v. TWITTER, INC.
as 1:2014cv00183
Defendant:
JOHN DOE, ONE, JOHN DOE, TWO, JOHN DOE, THREE and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES DEAN, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
NIXON v. CARAWAY et al
as 2:2013cv00380
Respondent:
4 OTHER JOHN DOE, BAILY, J. F. CARAWAY and others
Petitioner:
GARY E. NIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JULIUS v. CLEAR CHOICE FINANCIAL - BAY CAPITAL CORP. et al
as 1:2012cv00363
Defendant:
CLEAR CHOICE FINANCIAL - BAY CAPITAL CORP., HSBC FINANCE CORPORATION, HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
GLENN JULIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
