Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Heath et al v. Doe et al
as 2:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Heath and Anna Holliday
Defendant:
John Doe and U.S. Xpress Leasing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Doe v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2024cv00249
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nix v. Hutton et al
as 7:2024cv00337
Plaintiff:
Daric L Nix
Defendant:
John Hutton and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gregory et al v. Trussville, Alabama, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Gregory, Amy Gregory and Gavin Gregory
Defendant:
Trussville, Alabama, City of, Eric Rush, James McCool and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Headley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2023cv00692
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Cordell Clark
Defendant:
Joseph Headley, Franetta Riley, Tavores Surles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Burch
as 1:2023cv00365
Plaintiff:
Scott Myers
Defendant:
Paul Burch, Ms. Jackson, Sam Houston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Spring Hill College et al
as 1:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Spring Hill College, Craig McVey, William Robert Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Horsman v. Doe et al
as 2:2023cv01133
Plaintiff:
William W Horsman, III
Defendant:
Hon. John Doe, Hon. Tom Doe, Hon. Harry Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Attia v. Pascagoula Police, et al
as 1:2023cv00342
Defendant:
Steve Harvard, Randy Neil, Pascagoula Police and others
Plaintiff:
Joel B. Attia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00256
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
