Cases 1 - 10 of 2,060
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cantrell v. Kristin Leasing, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Robert Cantrell
Defendant:
Kristin Leasing, LLC, Morris Transportation Services, LLC and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Stewart v. The Kroger Company et al
as 3:2024cv00218
Plaintiff:
Bradley Stewart
Defendant:
The Kroger Company and John Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Thompson v. Stevens Transport, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Charlene Thompson
Defendant:
Stevens Transport, Inc., Darwin Umana and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Goad v. Lyde
as 24-10333
Plaintiff:
Landon Paul Goad and Sarah Lynn Johnson
Defendant:
Jeff Lyde, Clay County, Texas and John Does, 1-10
Laccinole v. Secure One Financial, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv01336
Plaintiff:
Christopher Laccinole
Defendant:
Secure One Financial, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Davis v. Kroger Limited Partnership I et al
as 3:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Charity Davis
Defendant:
Kroger Limited Partnership I and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Yarborough v. Ambetter of Magnolia, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
John Yarborough
Defendant:
Ambetter of Magnolia, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
