Cases 31 - 39 of 39
FULLER v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2012cv01198
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA OFFICE OF STATE PERSONNEL, STATE HIGHWAY PATROL and others
Plaintiff:
MELISSA FULLER
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Monk et al v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2012cv00706
Plaintiff:
Derrick J. Monk, Sr. and D.J.M., Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, William Graham, Denise Gold and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Parker v. White et al
as 5:2012ct03082
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Parker
Defendant:
Susan White, Mr. Holmes, Lt. Donnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgess v. County of Johnston et al
as 5:2012ct03017
Plaintiff:
James D. Burgess
Defendant:
County of Johnston, Wake Orthopaedics, LLC, Johnston County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seelig v. Keller et al
as 5:2011ct03243
Plaintiff:
Paul E. Seelig
Defendant:
Alvin Keller, Robert Lewis, Paula Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2011ct03196
Plaintiff:
Alfred Miller
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, North Carolina Department of Corrections, New Hanover Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US Airline Pilots Association v. AWAPPA LLC et al
as 3:2008cv00246
Plaintiff:
US Airline Pilots Association
Defendant:
AWAPPA LLC, John McIlvenna, Mitch Vasin and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
HOLTKAMP v. AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION et al
as 1:2007cv00167
Plaintiff:
LYNNE M. HOLTKAMP
Defendant:
AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION, AU OPTRONICS CORPORATION AMERICA, CHI MEI OPTOELECTRONICS CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Flanagan v. AU Optronics Corp., et al
as 3:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
Donna Jeanne Flanagan
Defendant:
AU Optronics Corp., AU Optronics Corp, America, Chi Mei Optoelectronics Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25 Clayton Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
