Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Ryan v. Mansapit-Shimizu et al
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
John T. Ryan and John Ryan
Defendant:
Dafne Mansapit-Shimizu, Deputy Director Marie Lizama, Evelyn Villapando and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mattson v. Streibel, et al.
as 1:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lacy Mattson
Defendant:
Aron Streibel, Daniel W Vogt, City of Caldwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dickerson v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2019cv01126
Defendant:
John Does 1-15, City of Portland and Multnomah County
Plaintiff:
Mark Dickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J.M. et al v. Major et al
as 3:2018cv00918
Plaintiff:
A.S., J.M. and R.L.
Defendant:
Jane and John Does 1-15, Jennifer Laib, Sherrie Mahurin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cathcart v. City of Seattle et al
as 2:2015cv01674
Plaintiff:
Alexa Cathcart
Defendant:
City of Seattle, David Blackmer, Juan M Ornelas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eline v. Hart et al
as 1:2014cv00508
Plaintiff:
Richard Eline
Defendant:
Dustin Hart, Richard Van Lear, Anthony Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
John Doe Company v. John Does 1-15 et al
as 3:2013cv02099
Plaintiff:
John Doe Company
Defendant:
John Does 1-15 and Gabriel Kornacki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sheikh v. State of Hawaii Department of Human Services et al
as 1:2012cv00701
Plaintiff:
Layla Sheikh
Defendant:
State of Hawaii Department of Human Services, State of Hawaii, John Does 1-15 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Rendon v. County of Multnomah et al
as 3:2011cv01401
Defendant:
County of Multnomah, John Does 1-15 and Daniel Staton
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Pena Rendon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
