Cases 41 - 50 of 51
CHILDS v. LAYTON
as 2:2014cv00401
Petitioner:
RICHARD CHILDS
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOHN LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SWALLERS v. PENCE et al
as 1:2014cv02090
Defendant:
JOHN LAYTON, MARION COUNTY CIVIL COURT, MARION COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPT. and others
Plaintiff:
BRENT ALLEN SWALLERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
CHILDS v. LAYTON
as 1:2014cv01964
Petitioner:
RICHARD CHILDS
Respondent:
SHERIFF JOHN LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SWALLERS v. PENCE et al
as 1:2014mc00106
Defendant:
JOHN LAYTON, MARION COUNTY CIVL COURT, MARION COUNTY PUBLIC HEALTH DEPT. and others
Plaintiff:
BRENT ALLEN SWALLERS
WILSON v. CURRY et al
as 2:2014cv00320
Defendant:
RAY CASSNOVA, ROBERT E. CLOVER, ROBERT G. CONNELL and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES G. WILSON
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANKH EL et al v. HILL et al
as 1:2013cv01471
Defendant:
M. ADDINGTON, ROBERT R. ALTICE, AMY BARBAR and others
Plaintiff:
MENES ANKH EL and TYREESE TAYLOR-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR-BEY v. CARLISLE et al
as 1:2013cv01075
Defendant:
SHEILA A. CARLISLE, TERRY CURRY, LINDSAY GEDIG and others
Plaintiff:
TYREESE TAYLOR-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. LAYTON
as 1:2013cv00905
Petitioner:
DERRICK BERRY
Respondent:
JOHN LAYTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SRIVASTAVA v. BAYH et al
as 1:2012cv01295
Defendant:
AFNI, INC., MARK BANNATYNE, JOHN BARTHOLOMEW and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN HERZ SRIVASTAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
LONG v. WHITE et al
as 1:2012cv00032
Defendant:
GREG BALLARD, LEE HOARD, JOHN AND JANE DOE NUMBERS ONE THROUGH TWO HUNDRED and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY LONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
