Cases 1 - 10 of 10
WYATT v. TROTTER, et al.
as 2:2016cv00425
Defendant:
JUDY ANDERSON, CITY OF TERRE HAUTE, COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM DOUGLAS WYATT, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andre Jackson v. Tim Osburn, et al
as 11-1514
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE W. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM OSBURN, Vigo County Jail Commander, JOHN MARVEL and KIM HAWKINS, Assistant Jail Commander
JACKSON v. OSBURN et al
as 2:2011cv00005
Defendant:
KIM HAWKINS, SHERIFF JOHN MARVEL and TIM OSBURN
Plaintiff:
ANDRE WALTER JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BECK v. MARVEL et al
as 2:2010cv00060
:
Defendant:
BOOKING JAILER-NIGHT SHIFT and SHERIFF JOHN MARVEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHEELER v. MARVEL et al
as 1:2010cv00218
Defendant:
NURSE JANE DOE#1, NURSE JANE DOE#2, SHERIFF JOHN MARVEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIXON v. VIGO COUNTY SECURITY ANNEX et al
as 2:2009cv00171
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CLYDE DIXON
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY SECURITY ANNEX and JOHN MARVEL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADFORD v. MOODY et al
as 3:2008cv00177
Plaintiff:
MAURICE ANTONIO BRADFORD
Defendant:
MOODY, VIGO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and JOHN MARVEL
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McClinton v. Nevada Legislature Counsel Members et al
as 3:2008cv00580
Plaintiff:
Jack McClinton
Defendant:
Nevada Legislature Counsel Members, David Parks, Bernie Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
KING v. BURISS et al
as 2:2008cv00376
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE KING
Defendant:
CHARLES BURISS, TONY BAUER, CHRIS GALLAGHER and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LILLIE v. MARVEL et al
as 2:2007cv00259
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH LILLIE
Defendant:
JOHN MARVEL, MIKE CIOLLI, DAN LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
