Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Millard v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Odin Millard
Defendant:
Amy Mitchell doing business as JM Farms, John Mitchell doing business as JM Farms, Joe Mitchell doing business as JM Farms and others
Dobronski v. Sbaiti & Company PLLC et al
as 2:2023cv11591
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant:
Sbaiti & Company PLLC, National Intake Center, LLC, Frederick Michael Branin and others
Maye v. Corrections Center of Northeast Ohio, et al.
as 3:2022cv02176
Plaintiff:
Ricco L Maye
Defendant:
Craig Eiden, Masser, Kevin Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maye v. Eiden et al
as 2:2022cv04249
Plaintiff:
Ricco L Maye
Defendant:
Craig Eiden, Masser, Kevin Bloom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03373
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard, Inc and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dalton v. Mitchell
as 3:2018cv00412
Plaintiff:
Bryan K. Dalton
Defendant:
John Mitchell, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell #630378 v. Shipman et al
as 1:2016cv01371
Plaintiff:
John Mitchell #630378
Defendant:
Brian J. Shipman and Barbara Sampson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv13603
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gantley v. Davis et al
as 3:2016cv01448
Plaintiff:
John Mitchell Gantley
Defendant:
Cris Davis and Southern Health Specialty/Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Bland v. Daniel French, et al
as 15-5418
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH BLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL T. FRENCH, Assistant United States Attorney, LOREN J. SMITH, United States Probation Officer, CLIFF L. CAVER, a Sex Offender Specialist at the United States Probation Office and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
