Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Washington v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
John Washington
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Washington v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv00030
Plaintiff:
John Washington
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jones v. Evans et al
as 3:2018cv00700
Defendant:
John Washington, LT Jane Evans, Jane Doe and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Monice Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv00001
Plaintiff:
John Washington
Defendant:
Nancy A Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427
Washington v. Champaigne et al
as 2:2014cv01349
Plaintiff:
John Washington, Jr
Defendant:
Greg Champaigne, Deputy Brossard, Sgt Cortez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zielinski v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc et al
as 6:2014cv00752
Plaintiff:
Warren S Dickinson, Jr , John J Pirritano , John Washington and others
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals U S A Inc, Takeda Pharmaceuticals America Inc, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ralleigh et al v. Monaco Coach Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv01215
Plaintiff:
Earl Ralleigh , Margaret Nevels , John Washington and others
Defendant:
Monaco Coach Corporation, American International Specialty Lines, Insurance Company of the State of PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jeanmard v. A-1 Unlimited Inc et al
as 3:2011cv00462
Defendant:
A-1 Unlimited Inc, John Doe, East Baton Rouge Parish Sheriffs Office and others
Plaintiff:
Troy D. Jeanmard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Champagne et al
as 2:2010cv01453
Plaintiff:
John Washington, Jr
Defendant:
Greg Champagne, John Nowak, Robert Dale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
