Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Tew v. Colvin
as 5:2014cv00607
Plaintiff:
John William Tew, II
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Williams v. Gwinn et al
as 5:2011ct03117
Plaintiff:
John Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
J.M. Gwinn, BJ Leggett, Gupton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deitz v. Astrue
as 2:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
John William Deitz
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WILLIAMS et al v. WOMBLE et al
as 1:2010cv00541
Plaintiff:
HANNAH WILLIAMS and JOHN WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LORRIE WOMBLE and BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bishop et al v. County of Macon, North Carolina et al
as 1:2010cv00066
Plaintiff:
John William Bishop, Donna J. Bishop and State of North Carolina
Defendant:
County of Macon, North Carolina, Macon County Sheriff's Department, Robert L. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Bishop et al v. County of Macon, North Carolina et al
as 2:2010cv00009
Plaintiff:
John William Bishop , Donna J. Bishop and State of North Carolina
Defendant:
County of Macon, North Carolina, Macon County Sheriff's Department, Robert L. Holland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
v. Vaught et al
as 4:2010cv00009
Defendant:
Beverly Vaught, John Williams Ingram, V, Dustin Riddle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vaught v. Ingram et al
as 7:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Beverly Vaught
Defendant:
John Williams Ingram, V, Dustin Riddle, Karl Scoggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vaught v. Ingram et al
as 5:2010ct03009
Plaintiff:
Beverly Vaught
Defendant:
John Williams Ingram, V, Dustin Riddle, Karl Scoggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaught v. Ingram et al
as 4:2010cv00008
Plaintiff:
Beverly Vaught
Defendant:
John Williams Ingram, V, Dustin Riddle, Karl Scoggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
