Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jacqueline Arndt, et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 20-3627
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Waren Kilburn, Dwayne Carr, Jose Rocha and others
Defendant / Appellant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
CLARK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv04189
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BRADLEY CLARK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
APFS, LLC v. Wade et al
as 1:2020cv05865
Defendant:
JONATHAN BRADLEY WADE and TARVOS TALENT, LLC
Plaintiff:
APFS, LLC d/b/a ADDISON GROUP and APFS, LLC doing business as Addison Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Arndt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2020cv02089
Plaintiff:
Timothy Ferguson, Ahrens Dederscheck, Ernest Cano and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SEARS v. BRADLEY et al
as 3:2020cv00086
Defendant:
STACY JARRARD and JONATHAN BRADLEY
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SEARS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv33007
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BRADLEY ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HALL et al v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03075
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL DENIGER, RUSTY BROWN, DUSTIN SIZEMOY and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hall et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02069
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Deniger, Rusty Brown, Dustin Sizemoy and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Zvonek v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv02932
Defendant:
Jonathan Bradley and Walmart Inc.
Plaintiff:
Loretta Zvonek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Avalon West Hollywood, LP v. Shaumon Lewis et al
as 2:2019cv00684
Defendant:
Jonathan Bradley, Does 1 to 10 inclusive and Shaumon Lewis
Plaintiff:
Avalon West Hollywood, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
