Cases 21 - 30 of 3,329
Babb v. Bishop
as 7:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Babb
Defendant:
Mark Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reigrod v. Delray Buick GMC
as 9:2022cv81961
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Reigrod
Defendant:
GARBER DELRAY INC. A Florida Corporation doing business as DELRAY BUICK GMC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Babb v. Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority-Duffield Jail
as 7:2022cv00590
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Babb
Defendant:
Southwest Virginia Regional Jail Authority-Duffield Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AUTERY v. MOORE et al
as 2:2022cv04015
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE AUTERY
Defendant:
CLASSIFICATION OFC. MIKE MOORE, GEORGE W. HILL CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, SHIFT COMMANDER LT. J. MCCAFFERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Babb v. Woody et al
as 7:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Babb
Defendant:
Lt. David W. Woody and Scott County VA. Sheriffs Dept.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KAUFFMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17315
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE KAUFFMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jonathan Smith v. Clark County District Attorney, et al
as 22-16223
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JONATHAN LEE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
CLARK COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, Family Support Division and INSKEEP, Child Support Enforcer
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv13544
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE JOHNSON and JONATHAN LEE JOHNSON, JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WAGNER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11089
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE WAGNER and JONATHAN L WAGNER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PAIT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11397
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN LEE PAIT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
