Cases 21 - 30 of 5,594
Jones, Dynzel v. Sanders, Daniel et al
as 3:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Dynzel Jones
Defendant:
Daniel Sanders, Paula Kuecker, Feltz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Fisher et al
as 2:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
Dewhite D Johnson
Defendant:
Brandon Fisher, Matthew Burns, Joseph Falke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Giles et al v. Sabert Corporation
as 1:2024cv02996
Plaintiff:
Frederick Giles, marcus jones and Craig Riddle
Defendant:
Sabert Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Albert Jones v. William Hyatte, et al
as 24-1591
Plaintiff:
ALBERT C. JONES
Defendant:
WILLIAM HYATTE, former Warden of Miami Correctional Facility; in his official capacity and BRIAN ENGLISH, Warden of Miami Correctional Facility; in his official capacity
Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. v. David Martin
as 24-1579
Plaintiff:
JONES LANG LASALLE AMERICAS, INC.
Defendant:
DAVID MARTIN
JONES v. MAJESTIC CARE CENTER et al
as 1:2024cv00633
Plaintiff:
TEDDIE B JONES and TEDDIE JONES
Defendant:
MAJESTIC CARE CENTER, MAJESTIC NURSING HOME, DAVID EARLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
JONES v. BONNER et al
as 2:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JONES
Defendant:
BONNER, REED, POPE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Jones v. Imperial Supplies LLC
as 1:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Brittany Jones
Defendant:
Imperial Supplies LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc. v. Shibuya
as 1:2024cv02726
Plaintiff:
Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc.
Defendant:
Darren Shibuya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
