Cases 1 - 10 of 33
GONZALEZ v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2023cv03446
Petitioner:
JOSE M. GONZALEZ
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, ROBERT CHETERKIN, DOREEN STANZIONE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez v. SCI-Forest et al
as 4:2022cv01237
Petitioner:
Jose L. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Superintendent of SCI-Forest and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivera v. Kijakazi
as 3:2021cv01574
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Gonzalez Rivera
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GONZALEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2021cv02453
Plaintiff:
JOSE ANTONIO GONZALEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROMERO ALFARO et al v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 3:2021cv09845
Plaintiff:
JOSE MIGUEL GONZALEZ and BETTY ROMERO ALFARO
Defendant:
XYZ CO(S) 1-10, JOHN DOE(S) 1-10, WALMART, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gonzalez Diaz v. Amello et al
as 1:2020cv00909
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Gonzalez Diaz
Defendant:
Jason Amello, Luc Marengere, Harry Palmin and others
Nominal Defendant:
Acer Therapeutics Inc.
Maria Gonzalez-Garcia v. Attorney General United States
as 20-1845
Petitioner:
JUAN JOSE CASTELLANOS-GONZALEZ and MARIA ANGELICA GONZALEZ-GARCIA
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Jose Gonzalez
as 20-1620
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSE ENRIQUE GONZALEZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jose Gonzalez-Reyes v. Attorney General United States
as 19-3161
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
JOSE REMEDIO GONZALEZ-REYES
COREY v. MICHAEL ANTHONY AUTO SALES, INC. et al
as 2:2019cv17993
Defendant:
Grimmer Ivelisse, CITY OF PLAINFIELD, Doe 1-10 John and others
Plaintiff:
PEARYER COREY and COREY PEARYER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
