Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Castaneda Flores v. Garland
as 24-873
Petitioner:
JOSE CASTANEDA FLORES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
MENDEZ et al v. ANGEL TREE SERVICE LLC et al
as 3:2023cv20420
Plaintiff:
ALVARO MENDEZ, JOSE CASTANEDA and JENCER CARILLO REYES
Defendant:
ANGEL TREE SERVICE LLC and SEBASTIAN MEJIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
MENDEZ et al v. ANGEL TREE SERVICE LLC et al
as 2:2023cv20420
Plaintiff:
ALVARO MENDEZ, JOSE CASTANEDA and JENCER CARILLO REYES
Defendant:
ANGEL TREE SERVICE LLC and SEBASTIAN MEJIA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
CASTANEDA v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv12508
Plaintiff:
JOSE CASTANEDA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Castaneda-Acevedo
as 23-50352
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Castaneda-Acevedo, also known as Jose Castaneda-Acebedo
USA v. Castaneda-Acevedo
as 23-50350
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Castaneda-Acevedo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Castaneda v. State of CA, et al
as 21-2134
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOSE CASTANEDA
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF CA, C.O.L.A., CITY OF L.A. and others
Galicia-Rivera et al v. Bakir, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05571
Plaintiff:
Esther Galicia-Rivera, Jose Eduardo Santiago and Jose Castaneda Martinez
Defendant:
Bakir, Inc. doing business as Lincoln Market, POM Group Inc. doing business as Lincoln Market, POM Group II Inc. doing business as Lincoln Market and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Jose Castaneda v. State of CA et al
as 2:2021cv07156
Plaintiff:
Jose Castaneda
Defendant:
State of CA, C.O.L.A., City of L.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
