Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Watson v. Manhattan Luxury Automobiles, Inc. d/b/a Lexus Of Manhattan
as 26-2424
Plaintiff: BRIAN WATSON, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DANIEL SAMARGHITAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ANNMARIE GREENE and others
Defendant: MANHATTAN LUXURY AUTOMOBILES, INC.
Respondent: CDK GLOBAL, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv06376
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv06373
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sullivan v. Espinal et al
as 7:2025cv04119
Plaintiff: Cordell Sullivan
Defendant: Raimundo Jose Espinal and Elite Laundry Services of Atlanta LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Espinal v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 1:2025cv00065
Plaintiff: Juan Jose Espinal
Defendant: Allstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Type: Contract Insurance
ET Management & Realty Corp. et al v. Antegrity Specialty Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv04998
Plaintiff: ET Management & Realty Corp., Jose Espinal and Franklin Guerrero
Defendant: Ategrity Speciality Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Type: Contract Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00843
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
LABAZE v. ESPINAL
as 5:2023cv01611
Plaintiff: KEHANA LABAZE
Defendant: JOSE ESPINAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Betancourt v. 206-16 Hollis Ave. Food Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00779
Plaintiff: Maxwell Alexis Tejeda Betancourt
Defendant: 206-16 Hollis Ave. Food Corp., Jose Espinal and Teofilo De Jesus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Ramirez v. 206-16 Hollis Ave. Food Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv00601
Defendant: Jose Espinal, 206-16 Hollis Ave. Food Corp. doing business as Compare Foods and Theo
Plaintiff: Fermin Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?