Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Garcia v. United States et al
as 3:2022cv00763
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia
Defendant:
United States, J. Meyers, National Gang Unit Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
GARCIA v. RUSSELL et al
as 5:2022cv01821
Petitioner:
JOSE GARCIA
Respondent:
KYLE RUSSELL and WALTER OQUENDO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv04964
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GARCIA v. OSBORNE et al
as 2:2013cv06419
Plaintiff:
JOSE GARCIA
Defendant:
OSBORNE, INMATE-ONE 1#, INMATE-TWO 2# and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 5:2011cv04073
Plaintiff:
JOSE GARCIA
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, TROOPER KEVIN P. HIBSON and TROOPER WILLIAM MCDERMOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Garcia v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Government
as 3:2011cv00375
Plaintiff:
Jose Garcia
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
as 2:2010cv06500
Plaintiff:
JOSE GARCIA , CLARENCE RADLOFF , PHIL STACKPOOLE and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GARCIA v. KIMMEL et al
as 2:2008cv01236
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL JOSE GARCIA
Defendant:
JANET KIMMEL, WILLIAM COLE, W. WOODS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
