Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Davis et al v. Mercier et al
as 4:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis, Jr. and Cleve Davis
Defendant:
Bryan K. Mercier, David Bollinger and Timothy Gardner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Davis et al v. Allstate Insurance Company
as 2:2023cv02777
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis, Jr. and Betty Davis
Defendant:
Allstate Insurance Company
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Davis v. State of Alaska
as 3:2022cv00073
Petitioner:
Michael Joseph Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2018cv03058
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Bowrosen et al v. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as NYS/1:16-cv-08070
Plaintiff:
Virgina DeCola Bowrosen , Joseph Davi, Jr. , Robert Pellechia and others
Defendant:
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Bowrosen et al v. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2016cv08070
Plaintiff:
Virgina DeCola Bowrosen , Joseph Davi, Jr. , Robert Pellechia and others
Defendant:
The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
Joseph Davis, Jr. v. Anthony Hedgpeth
as 13-17320
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSEPH DAVIS, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
ANTHONY HEDGPETH, Warden
Davis v. Hedgpeth
as 3:2011cv06480
Petitioner:
Joseph Davis, Jr.
Respondent:
Anthony Hedgpeth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Davis et al v. Biloxi Public School District et al
as 1:2010cv00172
Plaintiff:
Gilda H. Davis and Joseph Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Biloxi Public School District, Biloxi Public School Board, Board of Trustees and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. Bank of America et al
as 1:2010cv00023
Plaintiff:
Joseph Davis, Jr.
Defendant:
Bank of America and All Defendants
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
