Cases 11 - 19 of 19
DINGLER et al v. HATTEN et al
as 1:2017cv02200
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DINGLER and ASHTON DINGLER
Defendant:
JAMES N. HATTEN, JUSTIN S. ANAND, AMY TOTTENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dingler et al v. Hatten et al
as 1:2017cv03632
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dingler and Ashton Dingler
Defendant:
James N. Hatten, Justin S. Anand, Amy Totenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dingler v. Deal
as 1:2017cv03154
Plaintiff:
Ashton Joseph Dingler
Defendant:
Nathan Deal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Joseph Dingler v. State of Georgia, et al
as 17-13253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH DINGLER, on behalf of himself and all persons similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, GA DIVISION OF FAMILY & CHILDREN SERVICES, BOBBY CAGLE, DFCS and others
Dingler et al v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2017cv02194
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dingler and Ashton Dingler
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, GA Div. of Family & Children Services, Bobby Cagle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Dingler v. Equifax, et al
as 14-10444
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH DINGLER
Defendant - Appellee:
EQUIFAX, Consumer Reporting Agency, EXPERIAN, Consumer Reporting Agency and TRANSUNION, Consumer Reporting Agency
Dingler v. Equifax et al
as 3:2012cv00455
Defendant:
Equifax, Experian, Transunion and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dingler
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Joseph Dingler v. City of Southaven Mississippi, et al
as 09-60314
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH DINGLER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTHAVEN MISSISSIPPI, W TOM LONG, Individual and Official Capacity as Southaven Police Officer, BROOKE ANN ATKINS and others
Dingler v. City of Southaven, MS et al
as 2:2008cv00020
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dingler
Defendant:
City of Southaven, MS, W. Tom Long, Brooke Ann Atkins and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
