Cases 1 - 10 of 19
PINSON v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2015cv01833
Petitioner:
Jeremy Pinson
Respondent:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Joyce K. Conley, Raymond E. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Pinson v. Robert McFadden et al
as 5:2015cv00204
Defendant:
Joyce K Conley, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley Lappin and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Pinson v. McFadden et al
as 1:2015cv00162
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Robert McFadden, Harley Lappin, Joyce K. Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leigh v. John Doe #1 et al
as 1:2014cv01223
Plaintiff:
John S. Leigh
Defendant:
John Doe #1, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Harley G Lappin and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES et al
as 2:2014cv00122
Defendant:
MELISSA BAYLESS, J. F. CARAWAY, JOYCE K. CONLEY and others
Plaintiff:
KURT F. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 13-5145
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
WARREN v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2012cv00320
Defendant:
F. TIMOTHY COLEMAN, JOYCE K. CONLEY, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD EUGENE WARREN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
BOOTH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2011cv00294
Plaintiff:
SHAUN K. BOOTH
Defendant:
H.G. CHURCH, JOYCE K. CONLEY, T.K. COZZA-RHODES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOOTH v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2011cv01782
Plaintiff:
SHAUN K. BOOTH
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY LAPPIN, JOYCE K. CONLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saleh, et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 11-1072
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MOHAMMED SALEH, EL-SAYYID NOSAIR and IBRAHIM ELGABROWNY
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, MICHAEL MUKASEY, HARLEY LAPPIN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
