Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Francis et al v. Accubanc Mortgage Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv00902
Defendant:
JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N. A., EMC Mortgage LLC, Does, 1 through 100 inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Francis and Carmen J. Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 nr
John David Thomas v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N A
as 8:2014cv01291
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank N A
Plaintiff:
John David Thomas
Stephen H. Johnson et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N A
as 5:2014cv00777
Defendant:
Does and JPMorgan Chase Bank N A
Unknown:
David D Piper
Plaintiff:
Paula A Johnson and Stephen H. Johnson
Coffman v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N .A.
as 1:2013cv00732
Plaintiff:
Harvey Coffman
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N .A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torrice v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N. A.
as 2:2013cv14188
Plaintiff:
Carey Torrice
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N. A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tracy Dennison v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N A et al
as 2:2013cv04487
Defendant:
California Reconveyance Company, Does, JPMorgan Chase Bank N A and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Dennison
Byrne et al v. North American Mortgage Company et al
as 2:2012cv14159
Plaintiff:
Randal Byrne and Maureen Byrne
Defendant:
North American Mortgage Company , Washington Mutual Home Loans , Washington Mutual Bank F. A. and others
Janaszak et al v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 3:2012cv05427
Plaintiff:
Scott Janaszak and Storm Janaszak
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank NA , JPMorgan Chase Bank, N. A. and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norfolk County v. MERSCORP, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv10780
Plaintiff:
Norfolk County
Defendant:
MERSCORP, Inc., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Darryle Fields et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N A et al
as 2:2012cv03088
Defendant:
Does and JPMorgan Chase Bank N A
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fields and Darryle Fields
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
