Cases 1 - 10 of 17
(HC)Avila Gutierrez v. Warden F.C.I. Herlong
as 2:2023cv00646
Petitioner:
Juan Avila Gutierrez
Respondent:
Warden F.C.I. Herlong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Derrick Sanderlin, et al v. Jason Dwyer, et al
as 23-15487
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DERRICK SANDERLIN, CAYLA SANDERLIN, BREANNA CONTRERAS and others
Defendant / Appellant:
JASON DWYER, LEE TASSIO, JONATHAN MARSHALL and others
Defendant:
CITY OF SAN JOSE, EDGARDO GARCIA, JARED YUEN and others
Not Yet Classified:
NAACP OF SAN JOSE/ SILICON VALLEY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00570
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gonzales v. Barrett et al
as 6:2020cv00782
Defendant:
Timothy Barrett and Juan Avila
Plaintiff:
Jose Gonzalez and Jose Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
AVILA et al v. LPC COMMERCIAL SERVICES, INC. et al
as 1:2019mc00117
Defendant:
LINCOLN PROPERTY COMPANY and LPC COMMERCIAL SERVICES, INC.
Plaintiff:
JUAN AVILA and DUANE BURROWS
Rodriguez v. AutoTrust International, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv21239
Defendant:
Juan Avila and AutoTrust International, LLC
Plaintiff:
Edgar Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02416
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Ruthen Weems, III v. Brent Stroman, et al
as 18-50170
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RUTHEN JAMES WEEMS, III
Defendant - Appellee:
SERGEANT CONLEY, JUAN AVILA, PAUL SCRIVNER and others
Felipe Casas, et al v. Pioneer Hi-Bred Intl, Inc.
as 15-41478
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUAN AVILA, GUADALUPE GONZALEZ, JOSE HERRERA and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PIONEER HI-BRED INTERNATIONAL, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
