Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Mario Abernathy v.Glenda Marti et al
as 5:2024cv01042
Defendant:
Wendy Y. Medina, Leon Carlo Sayo, Lisa Sayo and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Racketeering (RICO) Act
RODRIGUEZ v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20177
Plaintiff:
JUAN LUIS RODRIGUEZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RODRIGUEZ KUILAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12889
Plaintiff:
JUAN LUIS RODRIGUEZ KUILAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rodriguez-Calderon v. USA
as 4:2019cv00776
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Luis Rodriguez-Calderon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
MENDOZA-LOPEZ et al v. JOHN MORIARTY & ASSOCIATES et al
as 1:2016cv02341
Plaintiff:
EDWIN MENDOZA-LOPEZ , ADAN MENDOZA-LOPEZ , JUAN CARLOS MENDOZA-LOPEZ and others
Defendant:
JOHN MORIARTY & ASSOCIATES, CCE SPECIALTIES, LLC, MJL CONSTRUCTION, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
USA v. Jose Rodriguez
as 14-50485
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE LUIS RODRIGUEZ, also known as Pollo, also known as Jose Rodriguez, also known as Jose L. Rodriguez, also known as Juan Rodriguez, also known as Juan L. Rodriguez, also known as Juan Luis Rodriguez
USA v. Juan Sanchez
as 12-14422
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JUAN LUIS SANCHEZ, a.k.a. Juan Luis Rodriguez-Herrera
The Dow Chemical Company v. Jose Rodriguez Diaz, et al
as 09-80034
Petitioner:
THE DOW CHEMICAL COMPANY
Respondent:
JOSE ISAAC RODRIGUEZ DIAZ, JUAN LUIS RODRIGUEZ DINARTE, ROBERTO RUQUE RODRIGUEZ GUZMAN and others
Rodriguez, et al v. USA, et al
as 07-55241
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARIA RAQUEL RODRIGUEZ, ROBERTO RODRIGUEZ, JUAN LUIS RODRIGUEZ and others
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOHN HOFFMAN, THEODORE THOMPSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
