Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
ROBERTSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VIA U.S. DISTRICT COURT THIRD CIRCUIT et al
as 2:2022cv03532
Plaintiff: THOMAS ROBERTSON
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA VIA U.S. DISTRICT COURT THIRD CIRCUIT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, U.S. POSTAL INSPECTOR, AL HERZOG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jane Me, et al v. USA, et al
as 22-1981
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE ME, JANE ME1 and JON ROE
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Defendant: JUDGE LESLEY ADAMS, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge, JUDGE AFFILIATED MANAGEMENT INC, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge, JUDGE MATTHEW ALBENCE, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge and others
Gotell v. Clarice et al
as 4:2021cv00664
Plaintiff: Shakayla Gotell
Defendant: Judge Mitchell Shahen, Denise Dymond, Angela Reed Strathman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alonzo Johnson v. United States of America, et al
as 20-3256
Defendant / Appellee: BRIAN D. ASTON, ATTORNEY, UNITED STATES PROBATION OFFICE, ROGER A. COX, Attorney and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ALONZO LAMAR JOHNSON
Defendant: SOO C. SONG, TINA MILLER, UNKNOWN GRAND JURY JUDGE and others
JOHNSON v. USA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv01129
Defendant: AGENT BLACK OH, CHEIF POLICE OF BRADDOCK, BUCHANAN and others
Plaintiff: ALONZO LAMAR JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SPENCE et al v. PENNSYLVANIA SUPREME COURT (M.D.PA.) et al
as 5:2018cv05277
Defendant: THOMAS DARR, PENNSYLVANIA SUPREM COURT (E.D.PA.), C.J. THOMAS SAYLOR and others
Plaintiff: ANDRE MITCHELL, ANTHONY LYONS, AESHA LYONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?