Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Curry et al v. Hill
as 1:2026cv04257
Plaintiff:
William Curry and Reginald McFarland
Defendant:
Judson Hill
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08299
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Johnson et al v. Enpro Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2026cv00200
Plaintiff:
Steven Lamar Johnson, Ticy Johnson, Alms Jones and others
Defendant:
Enpro Industries, Inc., Enpro Holdings, Inc., Italmatch USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv08093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. - Americans with Disabilities Act
R.S. v. Gray, et al.
as 26-3936
Plaintiff:
R.S.
Defendant:
JUDSON GRAY, BEN PICUOS, KITSAP COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv06399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Sangle v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval County)
as 3:2026cv01531
Petitioner:
Gregory Judson Sangle, Jr.
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American with Disabilities Act (ADA- Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
