Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Taylor v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00180
Plaintiff:
Julie Taylor
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Taylor v. Biomet Inc et al
as 3:2014cv00971
Plaintiff:
Julie Taylor
Defendant:
Biomet Inc, Biomet Orthopedics LLC, Biomet US Reconstruction LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melodie Kleiman v. Jaime Santana et al
as 2:2013cv05280
Defendant:
All Other Organizations, All Other Persons, Christina B Austin and others
Plaintiff:
Melodie Kleiman
Ambuehl, et al v. Aegis Wholesale, et al
as 13-4068
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN AMBUEHL, MARA AMBUEHL, AKA Maria Ambuehl, OLIVER BIGLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AEGIS WHOLESALE, AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE, BANK ONE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv01896
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Taylor v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv00091
Plaintiff:
Julie Taylor
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pilon, et al v. Aames Funding, et al
as 12-4043
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN PILON and SHARON PILON
Plaintiff:
JOHN AMBUEHL, MARA AMBUEHL, AKA Maria Ambuehl, OLIVER BIGLER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AAMES FUNDING, AEGIS WHOLESALE, AMERICAN HOME MORTGAGE ACCEPTANCE and others
Taylor v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 2:2011cv02592
Plaintiff:
Julie Taylor
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ambuehl et al v. Aames Funding et al
as 2:2011cv00693
Plaintiff:
John Ambuehl , Mara Ambuehl , Oliver Bigler and others
Defendant:
Aames Funding, Aegis Wholesale, American Home Mortgage Acceptance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ambuhel et al v. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group et al
as 2:2011cv00133
Plaintiff:
John Ambuhel , Mara Ambuhel , Oliver Bigler and others
Defendant:
ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Aames Funding, Aegis Wholesale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
