Cases 1 - 10 of 907
Braswell et al v. MAT Transport, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Marie Kathleen Braswell and Julio Cesar Arredondo
Defendant:
MAT Transport, Inc. and Brenda Lawyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
STIER, ESQ v. POSSEBON et al
as 3:2024cv04647
Defendant:
TW BRASIL LTDA, EMPIRE STRONG INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INTERMEDIATION, LLC, DIEGO POSSEBON and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN H. STIER, ESQ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02512
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Loyde v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Loyde, Jr
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01151
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Moran v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2024cv00123
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Moran, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Nevada and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Trevizo-Chavez
as 24-50167
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Julio Cesar Trevizo-Chavez
Garcia-Mairena, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1395
Petitioner:
ISMENIA GARCIA-MAIRENA and JULIO CESAR MARADIAGA-GARCIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez-Hernandez v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 7:2024cv00086
Petitioner:
Julio Cesar Gonzalez-Hernandez
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rojas v. Mogannan et al
as 3:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Julio Cesar Rojas
Defendant:
Kyli Mogannan and FNV Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
