Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Nooner v. Bryant et al
as 1:2019cv01014
Defendant:
Stacey Pectol, J. Leon Holmes, Sue Newberry and others
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrick Nooner v. Asa Hutchinson, et al
as 16-3157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Terrick Terrell Nooner
Defendant - Appellee:
Asa Hutchinson, Governor of Arkansas, Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Hillary Rodham Clinton, Attorney and others
Nooner v. Hutchinson et al
as 4:2016cv00378
Plaintiff:
Terrick T Nooner
Defendant:
Asa Hutchinson, Wendy Kelley, Hillary Rodham Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walton v. Churnenky et al
as 2:2014cv00958
Plaintiff:
Geary Wayne Walton
Defendant:
O Joseph Churnenky, Michael B Bernays, James H Kemper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jerrod Booth v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 09-15792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERROD LEN B.B. BOOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHOENIX, JACK HARRIS, John Doe Police Chief at City of Phoenix, MIGUEL DURAN, Police Officer at City of Phoenix and others
Jerrod Booth v. Maricopa County, et al
as 09-15794
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERROD LEN B.B. BOOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY, JOE ARPAIO, Sheriff, TIMOTHY OVERTON, Jail Commander and others
Booth v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2009cv00167
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Len B. B. Booth
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of, Jack Harris, Miguel Duran and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Booth v. Maricopa County et al
as 2:2009cv00031
Plaintiff:
Jerrod Len B. B. Booth
Defendant:
Maricopa County, Joe Arpaio, Timothy Overton and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jack Harris v. Doug Diltz
as 08-3650
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jack Harris
Defendant:
Darcy Oliver
Defendant - Appellee:
Doug Diltz, in his individual and official capacity
Blanco v. Cuciti et al
as 2:2008cv01470
Plaintiff:
Cecilio Blanco
Defendant:
Cuciti, Kuhn and Jack Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
