Cases 1 - 10 of 43
Walker v. Gauntt et al
as 6:2022cv00507
Plaintiff:
Billy Ray Walker
Defendant:
Judge John Gauntt, Judge Jack Jones, Judge Caril Staritt-Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lenderman v. Gauntt et al
as 6:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Jason Eric Lenderman
Defendant:
Judge John Gauntt, Judge Jack Jones, Cari L. Starritt-Burnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henson v. Jones et al
as 4:2020cv00194
Plaintiff:
Charles Mayo Henson
Defendant:
Daviess County Detention Center, Jack Jones, Emil Harzog and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Dunn et al
as 5:2020cv01325
Plaintiff:
Jack Jones
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Leon Bouldin and Muhammed Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Loyd v. Daviess County Detention Center et al
as 4:2020cv00110
Defendant:
Major Jack Jones, James Emmick, Daviess County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Christian J. Loyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Borroughs et al
as 4:2020cv00047
Defendant:
Officer Witts, Jack Jones, Officer Borroughs and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius LaVelle King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kassinger v. Maglinger et al
as 4:2020cv00027
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kassinger
Defendant:
Major Jack Jones and Jailer Art Maglinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
THRUSTON v. JONES et al
as 3:2019cv00200
Defendant:
JOSEPH MOORE, JACK JONES, ROLAND and others
Plaintiff:
DAMAREO LAVAD THRUSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyer v. Daviess County Detention Center et al
as 4:2019cv00092
Defendant:
Major Jack Jones, Arthur Maglinger and Daviess County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Ira Boles Dyer, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shemwell v. Daviess County Detention Center et al
as 4:2019cv00080
Defendant:
City of Owensboro, KCPC Psychiatric Center, James Hicks and others
Plaintiff:
Cylar Lamar Shemwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
