Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Romano v. Weeden, et al
as 22-1974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SALVATORE R. ROMANO
Defendant:
ASHBEL T. WALL, Individually and Officially, C.O. GEOFF, Individually and Officially, CAPTAIN DUFFY, Individually and Officially and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES WEEDEN, Individually and Officially, JOSEPH DINITTO, Individually and Officially, JACK WARD, Individually and Officially and others
Romano v. Weeden, et al
as 22-1980
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SALVATORE R. ROMANO
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES WEEDEN, individually and officially, JOSEPH DINITTO, individually and officially, JACK WARD, individually and officially and others
Defendant:
C.O. DEPHILLIPS, individually and officially, C.O. GEOFF, individually and officially, ASHBEL T. WALL, individually and officially and others
Romano v. Wall et al
as 1:2019cv00370
Defendant:
C.O. Tomassi, C.O. Dephillips, Captain Lanoway and others
Plaintiff:
Salvatore R Romano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DuPonte v. Wall et al
as 1:2017cv00397
Plaintiff:
Richard J. DuPonte, II
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Mathew Kettle, Jeffrey Aceto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Forbes v. Wall et al
as 1:2014cv00322
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Alfred Leach, Lt. William Galligan and others
Plaintiff:
Darcy Forbes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Wall, et al
as 11-1465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWN ROBINSON
Defendant - Appellee:
A.T. WALL, NANCY BAILEY, DAVID MCCAULEY and others
Morgan v. Wall et al
as 1:2010cv00241
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Morgan
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, Nancy Bailey, Joseph Dinitto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Wall, II et al
as 1:2009cv00277
Plaintiff:
Shawn L. Robinson
Defendant:
Ashbel T. Wall, II, Nancy Bailey, David McCauley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.