Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Jackson v. Buffalo County et al
as 8:2023cv00550
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Defendant:
Buffalo County, Micheal Mefferd and State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Buffalo County et al
as 8:2023cv00551
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jackson
Defendant:
Buffalo County, Nathan R. Arehart, State of Nebraska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lockhart v. Cartwright et al
as 8:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Charles James Jackson and Charles James Lockhart
Defendant:
Chris Cartwright and TransUnion
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jackson-Mackay v. Cotant et al
as 8:2022cv00010
Plaintiff:
David A. Jackson-Mackay
Defendant:
Vonnie Cotant, Michael Dedinsky, Julie White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. USA
as 8:2021cv00329
Petitioner:
Bernard Jackson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lightfeather v. Green et al
as 8:2021cv00208
Defendant:
Julie, Lauren Gaylord Baired, Brenda Mae Stinson and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reed v. Turnbull et al
as 8:2021cv00205
Defendant:
James Hagen, Adam Charter, Margaret R. Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Kayla Reed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Frakes
as 8:2020cv00458
Respondent:
Scott Frakes
Petitioner:
Michael W. Jackson
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lightfeather v. Osborn et al
as 4:2020cv03118
Defendant:
Trevor, Dawn, Malinda, Brenda Mae Stinson, Rusty Miller and others
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson et al v. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC et al
as 8:2020cv00308
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Sanofi US Services, Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Jackson and Karen Ellen Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
