Cases 21 - 30 of 765
FILZEN v. JACKSON et al
as 1:2024cv00259
Plaintiff:
KORRTEL FILZEN
Defendant:
JACKSON and HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARTING v. MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH HARTING
Defendant:
MADISON COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, TYLER JUGG, JONATHAN GRIMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SHANNON v. SHAFFER et al
as 1:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
DANTAVIS LAMARCUS SHANNON
Defendant:
SHAFFER, REGAL, MCCAFFERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRIER v. LAMAR et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
JACOB C. BRIER
Defendant:
AKILAH LAMAR, JACKSON, MCCAFFERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Miami Correctional Facility et al
as 3:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
DeAngelo M Bennett and Deangelo Bennett
Defendant:
Miami Correctional Facility, Maci Jackson, Branden Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
MARTIN et al v. MCCORKLE et al
as 1:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
KEVIN MARTIN
Defendant:
T. MCCORKLE, CONYERS, D. REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. BISHOP et al
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
THADDIOUS RICE
Defendant:
CHANCE BISHOP, JACKSON and CHLOE WARGNY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson, III v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
David Edward Jackson, III
Defendant:
Bernard A Carter, Angela McFerrin, Nadia Wardrip and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson, III v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00010
Petitioner:
David Edward Jackson, III
Defendant:
Warden
Respondent:
Indiana Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
