Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Campbell v. Julian et al
as 3:2023cv01225
Plaintiff:
Michael Jamal Campbell
Defendant:
Trooper Joseph Julian, Trooper Michael Wychock, Trooper James Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Condrad et al
as 3:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
Michael Jamal Campbell
Defendant:
Detective Corey Michael Condrad, Detective Munley, Detective Zech and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Lowery et al
as 4:2022cv00633
Plaintiff:
Michael Jamal Campbell
Defendant:
Officer Joshua Lowery, Welsh's Towing Company and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CAMPBELL v. WATCO COMPANIES, LLC. et al
as 2:2021cv09951
Plaintiff:
JAMAL CAMPBELL
Defendant:
WATCO COMPANIES, LLC., WATCO TRANSLOADING, LLC, WATCO COMPANIES, LLC and WATCO TRANSLOADING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Campbell v. Latham, Star No. 60 et al
as 1:2020cv05461
Plaintiff:
Jamal Campbell
Defendant:
Benjamin Latham, Star No. 60 and Daniel Kenny, Star No. 77
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPBELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv30882
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY JAMAL CAMPBELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Jamal Campbell
as 16-30788
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMAL CAMPBELL
USA v. Jamal Campbell
as 16-30787
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMAL CAMPBELL
Campbell v. Dart
as 1:2014cv04076
Plaintiff:
Jamal Campbell
Defendant:
Tom Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABNEY et al v. PLANT PERFORMANCE SERVICES LLC
as 3:2013cv00024
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ABNEY, MICHAEL S ADAMS, JOHN C ALDERMAN and others
Defendant:
PLANT PERFORMANCE SERVICES LLC doing business as P2S, FLUOR ENTERPRISES INC, BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
