Cases 21 - 30 of 47
USA v. Darnell Parker
as 21-3008
Defendant / Appellant:
Darnell Antonio Parker, also known as Juan Jamal Johnson, also known as DAP
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08029
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMAL JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jamal Johnson v. Moss Bros. Auto Group, Inc.
as 5:2019cv02456
Defendant:
Moss Bros Auto Group Inc, Moss Bros. Auto Group, Inc. and Susan Anderson
Plaintiff:
Jamal Johnson
Intervenor:
Moss Bros. CJD, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Johnson v. Western Illinois Correctional Center
as 3:2019cv03272
Defendant:
Western Illinois Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Jamal Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Western Illinois Correctional Center
as 1:2019cv07612
Defendant:
Western Illinois Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Jamal Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Bergerson et al
as 3:2019cv00865
Plaintiff:
Charles H Scott, Armann Jamal Johnson and Ronald T Means, Sr
Defendant:
Micheal Bergerson and Elizabeth Boehm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Torres (Deas)
as 18-1039
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ruben Torres, AKA Rube, AKA "T", AKA Ru, Antwane Williams-Bey, AKA Buck, Michael Chapman, AKA Nice, AKA Mizzo and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Willie Deas
Halcomb v. Johnson et al
as 2:2018cv00017
Plaintiff:
Derrick Halcomb
Defendant:
Jamal Johnson and Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Phelps et al
as 1:2017cv01195
Petitioner:
Jamal Johnson
Respondent:
Perry Phelps and Steven Wesley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Darnell Parker
as 16-3081
In Re - Petitioner:
In re: Darnell Antonio Parker, a/k/a Juan Jamal Johnson, a/k/a DAP
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
