Cases 1 - 10 of 116
HARRIS v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 5:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JAMES HARRIS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, UNITED STATES MARSHAL SERVICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stidwell v. Dart et al
as 1:2023cv16672
Plaintiff:
Devon Stidwell
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Terry Hake, Shawn McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. United States of America
as 6:2023cv01698
Petitioner:
Thomas James Harris
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Harris v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv07782
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
James Harris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Remedies on motion attacking sentence
Harris v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2023cv00076
Petitioner:
James Harris
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harris v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00072
Petitioner:
Melvin James Harris
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Johnson v. Prator
as 22-30735
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Steve Prator, Michael Taylor, Corporal Johnson and others
Harris v. Warden, Bellmont Correctional Institution
as 2:2022cv03672
Petitioner:
James Harris
Respondent:
Warden, Bellmont Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harris #292201 v. Johnson et al
as 1:2022cv00796
Plaintiff:
Willie James Harris #292201
Defendant:
K. Johnson, PC Setzer, M. Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Harris
as 22-30059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kareem Abdul Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
James Harris
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
