Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Larry v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03297
Defendant: Robert Rivett, Corey Holzer, Brittany P Greene and others
Plaintiff: James A Larry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James LarryIn re: James Larry
as 24-12078
Petitioner: In re: JAMES KEITH LARRY
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Goss, Sr. v. Larry et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv02978
Defendant: James C. Dean, Williemary Scott, Johnny Rich and others
Plaintiff: Darrell L. Goss, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. $361,407 in U.S. Currency
as 6:2019cv02349
Defendant: $361,407 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff: United States of America
Claimant: James J. Larris
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
James Larry v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-10896
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES KEITH LARRY
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN
Larry v. Gordy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2018cv00004
Petitioner: James Keith Larry
Respondent: Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Larry v. Warden, et al
as 16-10322
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES KEITH LARRY
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
James Larry v. Warden, et al
as 15-13016
Petitioner - Appellant: JAMES KEITH LARRY
Respondent - Appellee: WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF ALABAMA
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00981
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry v. Giles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv04201
Petitioner: James Keith Larry
Respondent: Sandra Giles and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?