Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Votto v. Cook et al
as 4:2019cv08246
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Arthur D. Levinson, Ronald D. Sugar and others
Plaintiff:
John Votto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bankhalter v. Cook et al
as 4:2019cv05881
Defendant:
Arthur D. Levinson, Craig Federighi, Ronald D. Sugar and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Bankhalter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fine et al v. Cook et al
as 4:2019cv05863
Defendant:
Arthur D. Levinson, Craig Federighi, Ronald D. Sugar and others
Plaintiff:
The Rosenfeld Family Foundation, Andrew Fine and Tammy Federman SEP/IRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zehrer v. Cook et al
as 4:2019cv05153
Defendant:
Arthur D. Levinson, Craig Federighi, Ronald D. Sugar and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Zehrer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thondukolam et al v. Corteva, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv03857
Defendant:
Ronald C Edmonds, Jeff M Fettig, DowDuPont, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
David L Everett, William C Mallonee, Krishnan R Thondukolam and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Bell v. United States Parole Commission et al
as 5:2016cv03568
Petitioner:
James Dalton Bell
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission, U.S. Attorney General, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
James C Hays v. Linda B. Bammann et al
as 2:2016cv01142
Defendant:
Linda B. Bammann, James A. Bell, Crandall C. Bowles and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Hays
Harshod Mehta et al v. City of Upland et al
as 5:2015cv01164
Defendant:
James Harold Bell, III, Lavelle Brown, City of Upland and others
Plaintiff:
Harshod Mehta and Kaushika Mehta
Harshod Mehta et al v. City of Upland et al
as 2:2015cv04495
Defendant:
James Harold Bell, III, Lavelle Brown, City of Upland and others
Plaintiff:
Harshod Mehta and Kaushika Mehta
Jean-Louis v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2014cv00199
Defendant:
Linda A. Bammann, Angela Barry, Tom Basmajian and others
Plaintiff:
Louis J. Jean-Louis
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
