Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Lantz Retirement Investments,, et al v. Brian Glover, et al
as 22-15171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LANTZ RETIREMENT INVESTMENTS, LLC, a California limited liability company, ANTHONY E. HOGG, as trustee of The Anthony and Stacy L. Hogg Family Trust dated November 18, 2005, FRED PORTER, as trustee of the Profit Sharing Plan Trust 2 and others
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN GLOVER, an individual, MESA SENIOR LIVING COMMUNITY, LLC/COURTYARD TOWERS, Mesa, Arizona, an Oregon limited liability company, GREGORY RODERICK, an individual and others
BOCK, SR. v. BOROUGH OF MOUNTAINSIDE ("BOM") et al
as 2:2019cv19922
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF MOUNTAINSIDE ("BOM"), JOSEPH GIANNUZZI, ANDREW YASINSKI and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES M. BOCK, SR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lantz Retirement Investments, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company et al v. Brian Glover, an individual et al
as 1:2019at00207
Defendant:
Frontier Management, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, Brian Glover, an individual, Mark Smith, an individual and others
Plaintiff:
Milo Eugene Watson and Patricia A. Watson, as Trustees of the Watson Living Trust dated April 11, 2001, Anita B. Hashim and Annette Davis, as Trustees Hashim Family Trust dated March 28, 1990, Arthur and Annette L. Davis, as Trustees of the Davis Family Trust dated May 27, 1994 and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Lantz Retirement Investments, LLC v. Brian Glover, et al
as 1:2019cv00379
Plaintiff:
Milo Eugene Watson, Verdi S. Boyer, Stanley R. Hughes and others
Defendant:
Brian Glover, Newmark Grubb ASU & Associates, Mark Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Bock et al v. HSBC Bank USA, N.A. et al
as 1:2014cv10535
Plaintiff:
James C Bock and Stacey A Bock
Defendant:
HSBC Bank USA, N.A. and PHH Mortgage Corporation
Mediator:
Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
