Cases 1 - 10 of 109
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024hc02073
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Jordan v. City of San Antonio, et al.
as 5:2023cv01511
Plaintiff:
James Walton Jordan and James Walton Jordan, III
Defendant:
City of San Antonio, city of san antonio police department, franklin mc blain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Jordan v. DOJ - Office of the United States Attorney
as 23-3862
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES B. JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
DOJ - OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Jordan v. Federal Court Security Officers
as 23-3873
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES B. JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL COURT SECURITY OFFICERS
Jordan v. County of Los Angeles
as 23-3759
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES B. JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, Department of Children and Family Services
Jordan v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, et al.
as 23-3767
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES B. JORDAN
Defendant / Appellee:
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, WATSON, Deputy at Stanley Mosk Court, official capacity, PLATT, Detective, Los Angeles Police Department and others
In The Matter of James B. Jordan
as 2:2023mc00154
In Re:
In The Matter of James B. Jordan
Plaintiff:
James B. Jordan
James B. Jordan v. Federal Court Security Officers
as 2:2023cv08183
Plaintiff:
James B. Jordan
Defendant:
Federal Court Security Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James B. Jordan v. United States Attorneys Office
as 2:2023cv07451
Plaintiff:
James B. Jordan
Defendant:
United States Attorneys Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv03311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
