Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Miller v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
as 3:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
James C Miller
Defendant:
Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Miller v. John Davids, et al
as 22-1335
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES LAMONT MILLER
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden, in their individual and official capacities, JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden, in their individual and official capacities, MICHAEL CURLEY, Warden, in their individual and official capacities and others
Miller v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00437
Petitioner:
James Junior Miller
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Miller #168439 v. Davids et al
as 1:2020cv00108
Defendant:
Robert Napel, James Schiebner, Gary Miniard and others
Plaintiff:
James Lamont Miller #168439
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Claiborne County Justice Center/Detention Center et al
as 3:2018cv00164
Plaintiff:
James R Miller
Defendant:
Claiborne County Justice Center/Detention Center and David Ray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Eaton, County of et al
as 1:2014cv00267
Plaintiff:
James J. Miller
Defendant:
Eaton, County of, Craig Morehouse, Larry Treadwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. Miller
as 3:2012cv00283
Petitioner:
Harvey E. Taylor
Respondent:
James R. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James Miller v. Willie Smith
as 08-1736
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES LAMONT MILLER, aka Money Mont
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIE SMITH, Warden
James Miller v. Willie Smith
as 08-1708
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES LAMONT MILLER, aka Money Mont
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIE O. SMITH, Warden
Miller #168439 v. Smith
as 1:2008cv00191
Petitioner:
James Lamont Miller #168439
Respondent:
Willie O. Smith
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
