Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Atterberry v. Wallen et al
as 4:2017cv00884
Plaintiff:
James Atterberry
Defendant:
Amy Wallen, Lisa Spain, Joshua Hutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arthur Bell v. Carol Howes, et al
as 14-1169
Petitioner - Appellant:
ARTHUR BELL
Respondent - Appellee:
CAROL R. HOWES, Warden, Warden, JENNIFER M. GRANHOLM, Governor, State of Michigan, PATRICIA CARUSO, Director, Michigan Department of Corrections and others
David Lytal, et al v. Barbara Sampson, et al
as 12-1639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID WILLIAM LYTAL and PHILIP BERRYMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA SAMPSON, Chairperson State of Michigan Parole Board, JAMES ATTERBERRY, Member, CHARLES L. BROWN, Member and others
Frank Nali v. Jodi Angelo, et al
as 11-1625
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANK NALI
Defendant - Appellee:
JODI ANGELO, LAURIN THOMAS, JAMES ATTERBERRY and others
Michael Dionne v. Barbara Sampson, et al
as 11-1477
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL DIONNE
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA S. SAMPSON, JAMES ATTERBERRY, MIGUAL BERRIOS and others
William Spencer v. James Atterberry, et al
as 11-1339
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM SIM SPENCER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES ATTERBERRY
Joseph Nelson v. James Atterberry, et al
as 11-1058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH JOHN NELSON
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES ATTERBERRY, SHAREE BOOKER, PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Warden and others
Chambers #095405 v. Granholm et al
as 1:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Floyd Chambers #095405
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Granholm, James Atterberry, Barbara Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curtis Jackson v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 10-2597
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CURTIS O. JACKSON
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director, BARBARA SAMPSON, JAMES ATTERBERRY and others
Chambers v. Granholm et al CASE TRANSFERRED
as 2:2010cv14761
Plaintiff:
Floyd Chambers
Defendant:
Jennifer M. Granholm, James Atterberry, Barbara Sampson and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
