Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 77
Larry Barber v. Everglades CI Warden, et al
as 15-10648
Petitioner - Appellant: LARRY JAMES BARBER
Respondent - Appellee: EVERGLADES CI WARDEN, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA PAROLE COMMISSION
Barber v. Mayo et al
as 1:2014cv21274
Plaintiff: Larry James Barber
Defendant: Larry Mayo , Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. James Barber We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-30050
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES BARBER
Barber v. Miller We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv00032
Plaintiff: James Barber
Defendant: James Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Asbury v. Tartarsky et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2013cv03364
Plaintiff: Willie James Asbury
Defendant: David Tartarsky, Don Driskell, Joette Scarborough and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Barber v. Steven Vershel
as 13-13412
Plaintiff - Appellant: LARRY JAMES BARBER
Respondent - Appellee: STEVEN M. VERSHEL, Trooper FHP, ANGELA BOTERO and PATRICIA NANZ, a.k.a. Patricia Noni
Barber v. Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv21882
Plaintiff: Larry James Barber
Defendant: Department of Corrections and State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Larry Barber v. Steven Vershel, et al
as 13-11824
Plaintiff - Appellant: LARRY JAMES BARBER
Defendant - Appellee: STEVEN M. VERSHEL, Trooper FHP, ANGELA BOTERO and PATRICIA NANZ, a.k.a. Patricia Noni
In re: Larry Barber
as 13-11586
Petitioner: In re: LARRY JAMES BARBER
Successive Habeas Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Larry Barber v. Steven Vershel, et al
as 13-11237
Plaintiff - Appellant: LARRY JAMES BARBER
Defendant - Appellee: STEVEN M. VERSHEL, Trooper FHP, ANGELA BOTERO and PATRICIA NANZ, a.k.a. Patricia Noni

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?