Cases 21 - 30 of 117
Naresh Rammohan v. Marc Thomas et al
as 2:2020cv10444
Defendant:
Michael Parris, David Norris, Mark Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Naresh Rammohan
USA v. Michael Barnes
as 20-60846
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael James Barnes
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
BARNES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv53596
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FOULKE v. WELLER et al
as 3:2020cv05506
Defendant:
JACOB HOLLOWAY, JOSHUA LAVOIE, DANIEL WELLER and others
Plaintiff:
MARY FOULKE and JACK YOUNG, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BARNES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv97128
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH JAMES BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARNES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv43268
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ricky Butler v. Superintendent Hull
as 20-6422
Defendant:
SERGEANT CHATHAM, NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL, NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL BOARD and others
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICER MALCOLM PARKER, OFFICER R. WALKER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER HARRIS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03010
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
BARNES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv24715
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARNES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv23523
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JAMES BARNES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
